Book by Russ Parsons
I enjoy the kitchen science in this book that's along side the recipes. There is nice discussion on deep frying and how to do a great job at it.
My ramblings on books I've read, music I've listened to and things I want to try.
Book by Russ Parsons
I enjoy the kitchen science in this book that's along side the recipes. There is nice discussion on deep frying and how to do a great job at it.
By Anne Lamott
Lamott’s book on how to write has five me much to think about. She focuses on fiction and takes us through the grueling, embarrassing, frustrating process of churning out a story.
Two points which make me think my blog does not make me a better fiction writer…
“New writers often make the mistake of making themselves the lead of the story “
“You are making this mistake of assuming everything that happens to you is interesting “
By John Steinbeck
Looking over my library history, I see that I’ve been picking at East of Eden for two and half years. While I have a desire to read great literature, I can loose focus when the book is finally on my e-reader.
Having said that, East of Eden is a wonderfully written, multi-generation epic. It explores the idea of good, evil and choice. You must vs you may.
By Edmund De Waal
I’m on a quest to understand the roots of antisemitism. Reading The Hare with Amber Eyes, the history of a family of secular Jewish bankers in Vienna. It showed me how integrated, needed, and influential a Jewish family could be, yet how they were always kept a little separated because of their background.The Nazi state weaponized its civil service to systematically isolate and target people, even amid internal administrative chaos. Modern politics feels chaotic, but there is some comfort that today’s power structures lack that unified, weaponized momentum.
The movie trailer deceived me. The image of a boy and a tiger on a boat evoked Calvin and Hobbes. The book is most certainly not that. A ship transporting a zoo sinks in the Pacific. Amongst the survivors are the boy and the tiger. Their time together is horrifying tale of survival.
Or is it? The book is known for its philosophy. Which, I think, is loosely that if two different stories fit the facts, then choose the story that inspires you the most.
I disagree with that philosophy. Of course I am a pragmatic realist. This does not diminish the book. It’s wonderful writing. It’s a testament to the author that one can disagree with the book, without rejecting it.
There is another way to interpret the book. That the boy was trapped on a life boat with a cannibal. After being rescued, rather than face those horrors, he tells a story of being trapped on the boat with a tiger.